With politicians [url=http://www.smh.com.au/news/national/teen-sex-on-the-taxpayers/2006/11/08/1162661724577.html]getting caught having sex with minors[/url], [url=http://www.smh.com.au/news/NATIONAL/MP-Hickey-caught-speeding-three-times/2006/11/07/1162661658715.html]breaking speeding laws[/url], and [url=http://abc.net.au/news/newsitems/200610/s1773644.htm]lying to the public[/url], it’s anyone’s guess why the people haven’t risen up and come up with a new plan of action for voting in politicians.
The old model of Democracy, that “by the people, for the people” expectation doesn’t seem to mean a whole lot these days with it more becoming “by the people?– well that’s nice… cushy job, lots of money, immunity… thank you, people. now for you? eh… you’ll never know I did nothing” making it a bit more complicated.
Sure, so what if [url=http://www.news.com.au/story/0,23599,20723996-1242,00.html]Milton Orkopoulos has sex with minors and buys drugs for them on the taxpayers’ dollar[/url]… it’ll only matter if he gets caught.
And he did.
So it matters.
I mean seriously, if my tax payer dollars are going into letting a politician buy some kid drugs and letting him fuck them, well fuck.
Fuck me… it seems like a waste.
Well no. No, no, no. Not like that… I’m not into that sort of thing, Mr. Orkopoulous, but seriously… spread the wealth. Hand some of those drugs or prostitutions this way. I don’t really want to have sex with minors, nor do I want to have sex with boys… I mean… you do…
Perhaps if this is really the course of action you want to take, you should be trying to enact a bill in Parliament that entitles every tax payer to a hit off of a Congressional Joint and a shag in the Conjugal Work program whereby after taking your hit, you lose any and all cares about your regular work and go get the royal shagging treatment from the best [url=http://www.aph.gov.au/senate/senators/homepages/senators.asp?id=7E4]prostitute[/url] or [url=http://www.aph.gov.au/house/members/member.asp?ID=4G4]gigolo[/url] that your government tax dollars can afford.
Actually, I apologise to all prostitutes and gigolos out there who read this blog. I am honestly sorry to offend your workforce with the likes of those two just so I could make something funny. It wasn’t even a very good joke and I apologise. If you’re reading this, please contact me and we can work out a Conjugal Reparations program to make things better.
Regardless, with problems with elected officials in both the criminal and deceitful sense, I’ve come up with a new way of voting and electing people to office. There’ll be no more need for campaigns [url=http://www.smh.com.au/news/NATIONAL/Labor-launches-interest-rates-campaign/2006/11/05/1162661548510.html]where one party uses memorable images[/url] in what could possibly be a slanderous (even if true) way. In fact, this idea is so iron-clad-tight in the way it’s formed that each candidate would probably find it more beneficial to paint their competitor in a good light since [i]that[/i] would be more detrimental to them.
I don’t really have a name for this model. I guess at the moment, I’d call it “The Wrap Sheet” model of voting. Here’s how it works:
Instead of voting on a candidate by way of their qualifications in helping the community and promising to achieve things when they’re in office, we vote on the crimes they’ve been convicted of in the eyes of the law or the people. We do this because really, that’s all that’s going to matter. We all know the politicians are going to lie about their promises the moment they hit office, yet we all believe it anyway because you never know… you might find an honest politician.
Then again, you might find a talking duck in the middle of your living room who’s pimped out your daughter to the guy next-door, even though you weren’t aware you had either a daughter or a duck. It’s all irrelevant now because Pimp Duck is demanding that you pay him protection money.
[b]Quack, bitch.[/b]
Anyway, I’ll give you some examples of how this voting model could actually work. Since the crimes are in the eyes of either the law or the people, sex with minors is a crime as is stupidity. So you would go on the following principles:
[i]I want someone who I know [url=http://www.theage.com.au/articles/2002/03/15/1015909903984.html]is homophobic[/url] so I’ll mark down Senator Bill Heffernan for re-election, yup.[/i]
It’s like an encyclopaedia or even an address book. You’d look at the sort of offense you’d want to recognise the politician for and then you’d vote for them on that principle.
We’ll try another one:
[i]I want someone who’s had a [url=http://archives.cnn.com/2000/ALLPOLITICS/stories/11/02/bush.dui/]drunk driving charge[/url] AND [url=http://politicalhumor.about.com/cs/georgewbush/a/top10bushisms.htm]is an idiot[/url]… so I’ll vote for this guy here named George W. Bush.[/i]
It’s that easy.
Think of how human instincts automatically side with or form against someone the moment that person does something that they like or dislike.
Why not pick the sort of people you want to run your government by what makes them the person they really are instead of their smiles and false premises that they flash on for the outside world to see to make them look nicer… prettier… what they think you want to see…
[b]…when you can vote for what makes them human![/b]
Okay, we’ll do one more:
[i]I want someone who doesn’t have any political qualifications but was really good in [url=http://www.imdb.com/find?s=all&q=Terminator]those Terminator movies[/url]. Hmm… [url=http://www.news.com.au/story/0,23599,20725468-2,00.html]Arnie for re-election[/url] it is![/i]
Democracy in a convenient take-away Happy meal. We’ll even throw in an action figure for free.
It won’t come with any action, mind you, but that’s no different from the promises made by your elected officials, so you won’t even know the difference.